Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Add a separate defintiion for PIPE_CRC_RES_HSW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Subject: *definition

On Fri, 31 May 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On hsw+ we only have one CRC result registers, instead of the

*register

> five we have on ivb, and some of the others have been repurposed
> to serve other CRC related purposed.

*purposes

>
> Since the hsw+ vs. pre-hsw register operate quite diffently

*differently

> let's add a separate definition for the hsw+ variant to make the
> situation a bit more clear. Also since we only use this from a
> hsw+ codepath there is no real benefit to be had with reusing
> the ivb register definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux