On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 04:01:56PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 08 May 2024, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 03:56:51PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> For HSW/BDW ULX machines are also considered ULT. For the sake of
> >> simplicity and clarity, handle this at the IS_XXX_ULT() macro level
> >> instead of two simultaneous subplatforms.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 ++++++---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 4 ----
> >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> index d1d21d433766..9c57af484ba8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> @@ -562,19 +562,22 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> >> IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_P, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPLU)
> >> #define IS_HASWELL_EARLY_SDV(i915) (IS_HASWELL(i915) && \
> >> (INTEL_DEVID(i915) & 0xFF00) == 0x0C00)
> >> +/* BDW ULX machines are also considered ULT. */
> >> #define IS_BROADWELL_ULT(i915) \
> >> - IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_BROADWELL, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT)
> >> + (IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_BROADWELL, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT) || \
> >> + IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_BROADWELL, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULX))
> >> #define IS_BROADWELL_ULX(i915) \
> >> IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_BROADWELL, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULX)
> >> #define IS_BROADWELL_GT3(i915) (IS_BROADWELL(i915) && \
> >> INTEL_INFO(i915)->gt == 3)
> >> +/* HSW ULX machines are also considered ULT. */
> >> #define IS_HASWELL_ULT(i915) \
> >> - IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_HASWELL, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT)
> >> + (IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_HASWELL, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT) || \
> >> + IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_HASWELL, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULX))
> >> #define IS_HASWELL_GT3(i915) (IS_HASWELL(i915) && \
> >> INTEL_INFO(i915)->gt == 3)
> >> #define IS_HASWELL_GT1(i915) (IS_HASWELL(i915) && \
> >> INTEL_INFO(i915)->gt == 1)
> >> -/* ULX machines are also considered ULT. */
> >> #define IS_HASWELL_ULX(i915) \
> >> IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_HASWELL, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULX)
> >> #define IS_SKYLAKE_ULT(i915) \
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> >> index 27b4a5882be3..a72efa919602 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> >> @@ -232,10 +232,6 @@ static void intel_device_info_subplatform_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> >> } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_ulx_ids,
> >> ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_ulx_ids))) {
> >> mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULX);
> >> - if (IS_HASWELL(i915) || IS_BROADWELL(i915)) {
> >> - /* ULX machines are also considered ULT. */
> >> - mask |= BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT);
> >> - }
> >
> > Oh... it is a long time since I don't look to these bits,
> > but I don't believe that the define above would cover this case here.
> >
> > It seems that you will miss the bits in this platform_mask.
>
> How come?
>
> What this does is make ULX platforms also match the ULT checks. Thus I'm
> changing the ULT macros to include ULX subplatforms.
>
> Or I don't understand what you mean.
I'm sorry, I had missed that mostly that platform_mask is used
at the decision of the defines above.
However, this change would have some side effect:
err_printf(m, "Subplatform: 0x%x\n",
intel_subplatform(&error->runtime_info,
error->device_info.platform));
The signature for GPU hangs error states would change on these
platforms. That could cause some confusion on people debugging
some issues. Although that's so old that I honestly doubt that
it would have some meangninful impact.
up to you:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>
>
> >
> >> } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_portf_ids,
> >> ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_portf_ids))) {
> >> mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_PORTF);
> >> --
> >> 2.39.2
> >>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
