On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:37:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure > wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case > and this function was totally unused until it started to be used again > by display with commit 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner > wakeref get towards get_if_in_use") > > However, on the display code, most of the callers are using the > raw wakeref, rather then the wakelock version. What caused a > major regression caught by CI. > > Another option to this patch is to go with the original plan and > use the get_if_in_use variant in the display code, what is enough > to fulfil our needs. Then, an extra patch to delete the unused > _noresume variant. > > v2: Keep grabbing wakelock but only assert for wakeref. (Imre) > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner wakeref get towards get_if_in_use") > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10875 > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 6 ------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 14 +++++--------- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c > index 048943d0a881..03dc7edcc443 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c > @@ -640,12 +640,6 @@ release_async_put_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains, > enum intel_display_power_domain domain; > intel_wakeref_t wakeref; > > - /* > - * The caller must hold already raw wakeref, upgrade that to a proper > - * wakeref to make the state checker happy about the HW access during > - * power well disabling. > - */ > - assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm); > wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(rpm); > > for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) { > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > index d4e844128826..2d0647aca964 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > @@ -272,15 +272,11 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) > * intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume - grab a runtime pm reference > * @rpm: the intel_runtime_pm structure > * > - * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference (mostly used for GEM > - * code to ensure the GTT or GT is on). > + * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference. > * > - * It will _not_ power up the device but instead only check that it's powered > - * on. Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where > - * the device is known to be powered up and where trying to power it up would > - * result in hilarity and deadlocks. That pretty much means only the system > - * suspend/resume code where this is used to grab runtime pm references for > - * delayed setup down in work items. > + * It will _not_ resume the device but instead only get an extra wakeref. > + * Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where > + * the device is known to be active and with another wakeref previously hold. > * > * Any runtime pm reference obtained by this function must have a symmetric > * call to intel_runtime_pm_put() to release the reference again. > @@ -289,7 +285,7 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) > */ > intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) > { > - assert_rpm_wakelock_held(rpm); > + assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm); > pm_runtime_get_noresume(rpm->kdev); > > intel_runtime_pm_acquire(rpm, true); > -- > 2.44.0 >