RE: [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/alpm: Add compute config for lobf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 5:18 PM
> To: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-
> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Hogander, Jouni
> <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>; Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/alpm: Add compute config for lobf
> 
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> > index c45d078e5a6b..c341d2c2b7f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> > @@ -10,9 +10,14 @@
> >
> >  struct intel_dp;
> >  struct intel_crtc_state;
> > +struct drm_connector_state;
> >
> > +bool intel_dp_get_aux_less_alpm_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> 
> The names here are supposed to be intel_alpm_*. Is the function in the
> wrong place or is the name wrong?

Sure, will change the function name to intel_alpm_get_auxless_status().

Regards,
Animesh
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> >  bool intel_alpm_compute_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >  			       struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > +void intel_alpm_compute_lobf_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > +				    struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > +				    struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
> >  void intel_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> >
> >  #endif
> 
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux