On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 22:34 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 06:58:44AM +0000, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 00:34 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Bigjoiner seem to be causing all kinds of grief to the PSR
> > > code currently. I don't believe there is any hardware issue
> > > but the code simply not handling this correctly. For now
> > > just disable PSR when bigjoiner is needed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > index eef62983e9db..a3ff916b53f9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -1584,6 +1584,17 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct
> > > intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * FIXME figure out what is wrong with PSR+bigjoiner and
> > > + * fix it. Presumably something related to the fact that
> > > + * PSR is a transcoder level feature.
> > > + */
> > > + if (crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes) {
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > + "PSR disabled due to bigjoiner\n");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > Are these problems with both PSR1 and PSR2?
>
> I didn't look at he logs in that much detail.
>
> It's now happening in CI because the bigjoiner force knob is
> getting leaked to all kinds of tests. Eg. this might be one:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14519/re-mtlp-1/igt@kms_busy@xxxxxxxxxx
>
