Ping! Any thoughts here? Andi On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:19:48PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi, > > this series does basically two things: > > 1. Disables automatic load balancing as adviced by the hardware > workaround. > > 2. Assigns all the CCS slices to one single user engine. The user > will then be able to query only one CCS engine > > >From v5 I have created a new file, gt/intel_gt_ccs_mode.c where > I added the intel_gt_apply_ccs_mode(). In the upcoming patches, > this file will contain the implementation for dynamic CCS mode > setting. > > Thanks Tvrtko, Matt, John and Joonas for your reviews! > > Andi > > Changelog > ========= > v5 -> v6 (thanks Matt for the suggestions in v6) > - Remove the refactoring and the for_each_available_engine() > macro and instead do not create the intel_engine_cs structure > at all. > - In patch 1 just a trivial reordering of the bit definitions. > > v4 -> v5 > - Use the workaround framework to do all the CCS balancing > settings in order to always apply the modes also when the > engine resets. Put everything in its own specific function to > be executed for the first CCS engine encountered. (Thanks > Matt) > - Calculate the CCS ID for the CCS mode as the first available > CCS among all the engines (Thanks Matt) > - create the intel_gt_ccs_mode.c function to host the CCS > configuration. We will have it ready for the next series. > - Fix a selftest that was failing because could not set CCS2. > - Add the for_each_available_engine() macro to exclude CCS1+ and > start using it in the hangcheck selftest. > > v3 -> v4 > - Reword correctly the comment in the workaround > - Fix a buffer overflow (Thanks Joonas) > - Handle properly the fused engines when setting the CCS mode. > > v2 -> v3 > - Simplified the algorithm for creating the list of the exported > uabi engines. (Patch 1) (Thanks, Tvrtko) > - Consider the fused engines when creating the uabi engine list > (Patch 2) (Thanks, Matt) > - Patch 4 now uses a the refactoring from patch 1, in a cleaner > outcome. > > v1 -> v2 > - In Patch 1 use the correct workaround number (thanks Matt). > - In Patch 2 do not add the extra CCS engines to the exposed > UABI engine list and adapt the engine counting accordingly > (thanks Tvrtko). > - Reword the commit of Patch 2 (thanks John). > > Andi Shyti (3): > drm/i915/gt: Disable HW load balancing for CCS > drm/i915/gt: Do not generate the command streamer for all the CCS > drm/i915/gt: Enable only one CCS for compute workload > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 20 ++++++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_ccs_mode.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_ccs_mode.h | 13 +++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 6 ++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 30 ++++++++++++++-- > 6 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_ccs_mode.c > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_ccs_mode.h > > -- > 2.43.0
