On Wed, 20 Mar 2024, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 02:24:08PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> >> > Hi Julia et al, >> > >> > In Linux drm/i915 driver (drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.[ch]) >> > we have a magic macro like this: >> > >> > #define with_intel_pps_lock(dp, wf) \ >> >> Did you try declaring: >> >> iterator name with_intel_pps_lock; >> >> up with the metavariables? > > Nope, didn't know about that one. > > Seems to work fine with that. Thanks. Okay, I have another one wrt macros. :) I'm trying to add a completely new variadic macro, but it fails at "...". I've tried all sorts of things, but can't seem to be able to add a literal "...". I've tested that my cocci patch works with x's: + #define fn(p, xxx) foo(__VA_ARGS__) but when I try to make it actually variadic like: + #define fn(p, ...) foo(__VA_ARGS__) it gives me error. Is there a way to escape? Even tried to use a fresh identifier vararg = "..."; but cocci made them unique with numbering "...0" and "...1" etc. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
