On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: >> I also wonder whether should we really emphasize things like "master"/"slave" >> in function names. I thought that one idea in our refactoring was to unify >> joined pipes handling so that there are no(or at least almost no) explicit code >> paths/function names for masters/slaves. > > There are no master vs. slave functions. The split is going to be > transcoder/port vs. pipe. Besides, for modern platforms the spec has already been changed to use primary/secondary terminology. When renaming or refactoring stuff, please switch to them instead of sticking with master/slave. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
