RE: Regression on linux-next (next-20240228)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Mathew,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 6:52 PM
> To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kurmi, Suresh Kumar
> <suresh.kumar.kurmi@xxxxxxxxx>; Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240228)
> 
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:03:13AM +0000, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
> wrote:
> > > Could you try putting the two:
> > >
> > > -                       list_del(&folio->lru);
> > >
> > > statements back in and see if that fixes it?
> >
> > That seems to fix it.
> >
> >                 if (!folio_put_testzero(folio))
> > +                       list_del(&folio->lru);
> >                         continue;
> 
> Ummm ... did you put { and } around this?  Otherwise the indentation is
> misleading and what you're actually done is:
> 
> 		if (!folio_put_testzero(folio))
> 			list_del(&folio->lru);
> 		continue;
> 
> which will simply leak memory.
> 

Oops look like a miss on our side. Let us re-do this and get back to you.

Regards

Chaitanya

> >                 if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> >                         __folio_put_large(folio);
> > +                       list_del(&folio->lru);
> >                         continue;
> >                 }
> > Regards
> >
> > Chaitanya




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux