On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 06:49:59AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 03:59:06PM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote: ... > +#define __GENMASK(t, h, l) \ > + ((~0 - (1 << (l)) + 1) & (~0 >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h)))) What's wrong on using the UL/ULL() macros? Also it would be really good to avoid bifurcation of the implementations of __GENMASK() for both cases. ... > -#define __GENMASK(h, l) \ > - (((~UL(0)) - (UL(1) << (l)) + 1) & \ > - (~UL(0) >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h)))) This at bare minimum can be left untouched for asm case, no? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
