Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: wait for IPS_ENABLE when enabling IPS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 06:02:30PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/9/20 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:18:29PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >> 2013/9/20 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:24:33PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:03:06PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >> >> > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > At the end of haswell_crtc_enable we have an intel_wait_for_vblank
> >> >> > with a big comment, and the message suggests it's a workaround for
> >> >> > something we don't really understand. So I removed that wait and
> >> >> > started getting HW state readout error messages saying that the IPS
> >> >> > state is not what we expected.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I investigated and concluded that after you write IPS_ENABLE to
> >> >> > IPS_CTL, the bit will only actually become 1 on the next vblank. So
> >> >> > add code to wait for the IPS_ENABLE bit. We don't really need this
> >> >> > wait right now due to the wait I already mentioned, but at least this
> >> >> > one has a reason to be there, while the other one is just to
> >> >> > workaround some problem: we may remove it in the future.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The wait also acts as a POSTING_READ which we missed.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>
> >> >> Both patches:
> >> >> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>
> >> >> I was thinking that maybe the intel_wait_for_vblank would be better from
> >> >> a documenting perspective - and it would also give warnings for trying
> >> >> to enable ips whilst the pipe was off. But you would still need the wait
> >> >> for IPS_ENABLE as confirmation anyway.
> >> >
> >> > Both queued for -next, thanks for the patches&review.
> >>
> >> Hmmm, this patch depends on the "enable planes only after the pipe is
> >> really running" patch. Due to that missing patch, now I get
> >> "[drm:hsw_enable_ips] *ERROR* Timed out waiting for IPS enable" when
> >> booting. I should have said this, sorry :(
> >
> > Ok, I've dropped it again.
> 
> It should be safe to merge it now.

Done, thanks for the ping.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux