On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 8:36 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2024, Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:06 AM David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> If KUnit is built as a module, and it's unloaded, the kunit_bus is not
> >> unregistered. This causes an error if it's then re-loaded later, as we
> >> try to re-register the bus.
> >>
> >> Unregister the bus and root_device on shutdown, if it looks valid.
> >>
> >> In addition, be more specific about the value of kunit_bus_device. It
> >> is:
> >> - a valid struct device* if the kunit_bus initialised correctly.
> >> - an ERR_PTR if it failed to initialise.
> >> - NULL before initialisation and after shutdown.
> >>
> >> Fixes: d03c720e03bd ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices")
> >> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have tested this with modules and it looks good to me!
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -Rae
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for the patch and review!
>
> Is this on its way to some v6.8-rc's? The regression in -rc1 is hurting
> our CI.
Hello!
This patch has been accepted on the kselftest/kunit-fixes branch
(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit-fixes&id=829388b725f8d266ccec32a2f446717d8693eaba)
and is heading towards a future v6.8-rc.
Thanks!
-Rae
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jani.
>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
