Re: Re: Patch "drm: Fix color LUT rounding" has been added to the 6.7-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:35:33AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 06:53:03PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 11:17:28AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 08:35:24PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:16:48AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 08:05:19PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 12:03:20PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > >
> > >     drm: Fix color LUT rounding
> > >
> > > to the 6.7-stable tree which can be found at:
> > >     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> > >
> > > The filename of the patch is:
> > >      drm-fix-color-lut-rounding.patch
> > > and it can be found in the queue-6.7 subdirectory.
> > >
> > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> > > please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
> >
> > I guess I wasn't clear enough in the other mail...
> >
> > NAK for all of backports of this patch.
>
> Ok, but why?  It seems that you are fixing a real issue here, right?  If
> not, the changelog is not clear with that at all...
>
> I'll go drop it now, thanks.

Because backporting it would require other backports that depend on
the rounding behaviour.

Can I somehow fully opt out of these automagic backports?
If I want my stuff backported I'll ask for it.

You can, just let me know what exact files should be ignored, or you can
send a patch against this file:
	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/ignore_list

I think we should add at least i915 and xe there. cc: maintainers

It does feel a little wild to decide a patch needs to be backported
based on the commit title starting with "Fix", or whatever way was used
here. We always relied on patches being backported based on a) having a
Fixes: trailer and  b) the commit pointed out in that trailer
being present in that stable version. Or the others options shown
in Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst

Looking at the commit in question, c6fbb6bca10838485b820e8a26c23996f77ce580
there's no such a trailer. Did I miss something from
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst?

Where did you see anything about the Fixes: trailer in the document
you've pointed to?

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux