RE: [PATCH v3 04/21] drm/i915/psr: Rename intel_psr_enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2024 3:40 PM
> To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>; Hogander, Jouni
> <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 04/21] drm/i915/psr: Rename intel_psr_enabled
> 
> Intel_psr_enabled is now misleading name as we are using main link on with
> panel replay. I.e. link retraining is not controlled by hardware. Rename
> intel_psr_enabled as intel_psr_hw_controls_link_retrain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c  | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index ab415f41924d..e7cda3162ea2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4951,7 +4951,7 @@ intel_dp_needs_link_retrain(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>  	 * Also when exiting PSR, HW will retrain the link anyways fixing
>  	 * any link status error.
>  	 */
> -	if (intel_psr_enabled(intel_dp))
> +	if (intel_psr_hw_controls_link_retrain(intel_dp))
>  		return false;
> 
>  	if (drm_dp_dpcd_read_phy_link_status(&intel_dp->aux,
> DP_PHY_DPRX, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index d11f8ea6e0a9..7b3290f4e0b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -3011,7 +3011,7 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>  	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
>  }
> 
> -bool intel_psr_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +bool intel_psr_hw_controls_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)

Based on CAN_PSR() check the function will return early and only get executed for psr. No sure still do we need to rename it?

Regards,
Animesh 
>  {
>  	bool ret;
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> index cde781df84d5..f7c5cc07864f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ void intel_psr_get_config(struct intel_encoder
> *encoder,  void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u32 psr_iir);
> void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);  void
> intel_psr_wait_for_idle_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *new_crtc_state); -bool intel_psr_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +bool intel_psr_hw_controls_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  				struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>  void intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state);
> --
> 2.34.1





[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux