Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: limit eDP MSO pipe only for display version 20 and below

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Coelho, Luciano (2024-01-26 06:24:29-03:00)
>On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 10:22 -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>> Hi, Luca!
>
>Hi Gustavo!
>
>
>> Quoting Luca Coelho (2024-01-24 05:52:29-03:00)
>> > The pipes that can be used for eDP MSO are limited to pipe A (and
>> > sometimes also pipe B) only for display version 20 and below.
>> > 
>> > Modify the function that returns the pipe mask for eDP MSO so that
>> > these limitations only apply to version 20 and below, enabling all
>> > pipes otherwise.
>> > 
>> > Bspec: 68923
>> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 9 +++++++--
>> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> > index 922194b957be..5c99ae148213 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> > @@ -2336,13 +2336,18 @@ static void intel_ddi_power_up_lanes(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> >         }
>> > }
>> > 
>> > -/* Splitter enable for eDP MSO is limited to certain pipes. */
>> > +/*
>> > + * Splitter enable for eDP MSO is limited to certain pipes, on certain
>> > + * platforms.
>> > + */
>> > static u8 intel_ddi_splitter_pipe_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> > {
>> >         if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915))
>> 
>> Looks like Xe_LPD+ (MTL's display) and Xe2_LPD (LNL's display) both support both
>> pipes A and B. For Xe_LPD+ we have that info in BSpec 55473 and for Xe2_LPD, in
>> BSpec 68923. So, I think we could:
>> 
>>   a. OR the condition above with IS_DISPLAY_IP_RANGE(i915, IP_VER(14, 0),
>>      IP_VER(20, 0)), and
>>   b. And make the "else if" below be about display versions below 14.
>
>Okay, but I guess we have never tested this with MTL and LNL, so can we
>be sure we won't break anything?

That's a good point. Not sure if we have the required CI infra to verify this.

--
Gustavo Sousa

>
>In any case, we have bspecs for these, so I'll make the change as you
>suggested.
>
>> With those additions,
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>Thanks!
>
>--
>Cheers,
>Luca.




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux