On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:30:10AM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Ville > > Syrjala > > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 3:55 PM > > To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915: Cursor vblank evasion > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > MTL seems very good at racing the cursor mailbox updates against the vblank, > > causing things to not latch for long enough to cause GTT faults. Attempt to hook > > up vblank evasions into the legacy cursor path to avoid this. > > > > Also revert a dangerous wm/ddb change related to cursors. > > I have already RB'ed the changes in the series but somehow patchwork had issues and > not reflecting the same. > > FWIW, this series is > Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> > > Please merge once the CI results show green, seems one test > igt@kms_cursor_legacy@torture-move@pipe-a throwing some warnings. Seems we're still seeing some timeouts from the vblank evasion, indicating the schedule_timeout(1ms) took approximately some integer multiple of the frame time :( To confirm what's happening I might need to pull the full vblank evasion debugs to into the cursor path as well... -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
