> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Jouni
> Högander
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 6:43 PM
> To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/i915/psr: Add sink_panel_replay_su_support
> to intel_psr
>
> Add new boolean to store panel replay selective update support of sink.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index 8315ec307d5f..3151741f49f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1721,6 +1721,7 @@ struct intel_psr {
> u16 su_y_granularity;
> bool source_panel_replay_support;
> bool sink_panel_replay_support;
> + bool sink_panel_replay_su_support;
This patch can be squashed with the patch which is using the variable.
Early patches psr2 get modified to sel_update .. can we have similar approach? Then we do not need extra variable.
Regards,
Animesh
> bool panel_replay_enabled;
> u32 dc3co_exitline;
> u32 dc3co_exit_delay;
> --
> 2.34.1
