On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:09:32AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That will hopefully catch which path is consuming too much time > > This is what I got: > > restarting timeout[2] (14, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[2] (14, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0) > restarting timeout[-1] (17, 0, 0) Suspiciously like we block for an entire vrefresh to submit one batch. Hmm, do you mind sending me your complete Xorg.0.log? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
