On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> intel_wakeref_t is supposed to be a mostly opaque cookie to its
> users. It should only be checked for being non-zero and set to
> zero. Debug logging its actual value is meaningless. Switch to just
> debug logging whether the async_put_wakeref is non-zero.
>
> The issue dates back to much earlier than
> commit b49e894c3fd8 ("drm/i915: Replace custom intel runtime_pm tracker
> with ref_tracker library"), but this is the one that brought about a
> build failure due to the printf format.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240102111222.2db11208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: b49e894c3fd8 ("drm/i915: Replace custom intel runtime_pm tracker with ref_tracker library")
> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 5f091502719b..6fd4fa52253a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -405,8 +405,8 @@ print_async_put_domains_state(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains)
> struct drm_i915_private,
> display.power.domains);
>
> - drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "async_put_wakeref %lu\n",
> - power_domains->async_put_wakeref);
> + drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "async_put_wakeref: %s\n",
> + str_yes_no(power_domains->async_put_wakeref));
>
> print_power_domains(power_domains, "async_put_domains[0]",
> &power_domains->async_put_domains[0]);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
