On Thu, 04 Jan 2024, José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> i915 defines it as unsigned long so Xe should do the same to avoid
> compilation warnings:
>
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.o
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/xe/i915-display/intel_display_power_well.o
> In file included from ./include/drm/drm_mm.h:51,
> from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h:11,
> from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h:11,
> from ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/gem/i915_gem_object.h:11,
> from ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h:15,
> from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c:8:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c: In function ‘print_async_put_domains_state’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c:408:29: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘int’ [-Wformat=]
> 408 | drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "async_put_wakeref %lu\n",
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 409 | power_domains->async_put_wakeref);
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | int
> ./include/drm/drm_print.h:410:39: note: in definition of macro ‘drm_dev_dbg’
> 410 | __drm_dev_dbg(NULL, dev, cat, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> | ^~~
> ./include/drm/drm_print.h:510:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘drm_dbg_driver’
> 510 | #define drm_dbg(drm, fmt, ...) drm_dbg_driver(drm, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c:408:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘drm_dbg’
> 408 | drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "async_put_wakeref %lu\n",
> | ^~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c:408:50: note: format string is defined here
> 408 | drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "async_put_wakeref %lu\n",
> | ~~^
> | |
> | long unsigned int
> | %u
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.o
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.o
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/xe/i915-display/intel_display_trace.o
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/xe/i915-display/intel_display_wa.o
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_query.o
>
> Fixes: 44e694958b95 ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
I think the real issue is that we're trying to print the value of
something that's supposed to be an opaque cookie, and the fix for that
is [1].
However, no harm in syncing the types.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240104164600.783371-1-jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h
> index 1c5e30cf10caa..ecb1c07077069 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> -typedef bool intel_wakeref_t;
> +typedef unsigned long intel_wakeref_t;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
