Hi Andrzej, On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:09:37PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > After i915_active_unlock_wait i915_active can be still non-idle due > to barrier async handling in signal_irq_work. As a result one can observe > following errors: > bcs0: heartbeat pulse did not flush idle tasks > *ERROR* pulse active pulse_active [i915]:pulse_retire [i915] > *ERROR* pulse count: 0 > *ERROR* pulse preallocated barriers? no > > To prevent it let's wait explicitly for idleness. > > v2: wait only in live_idle tests > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Andi
