From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> cdclk_pll_is_unknown() used ~0 when checking for the "VCO is unknown" value, but the assignment uses -1. They are the same in the end, but let's use the same ~0 form on both sides for consistency. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c index b93d1ad7936d..0dca29ec799b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ static void skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) /* force cdclk programming */ dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.cdclk = 0; /* force full PLL disable + enable */ - dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco = -1; + dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco = ~0; } static void skl_cdclk_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) @@ -2075,7 +2075,7 @@ static void bxt_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.cdclk = 0; /* force full PLL disable + enable */ - dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco = -1; + dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco = ~0; } static void bxt_cdclk_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) -- 2.41.0