On 15/11/2023 10:54, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
The only task of intel_gt_release_all is to zero gt table. Calling
it on error path prevents intel_gt_driver_late_release_all (called from
i915_driver_late_release) to cleanup GTs, causing leakage.
After i915_driver_late_release GT array is not used anymore so
it does not need cleaning at all.
Sample leak report:
BUG i915_request (...): Objects remaining in i915_request on __kmem_cache_shutdown()
...
Object 0xffff888113420040 @offset=64
Allocated in __i915_request_create+0x75/0x610 [i915] age=18339 cpu=1 pid=1454
kmem_cache_alloc+0x25b/0x270
__i915_request_create+0x75/0x610 [i915]
i915_request_create+0x109/0x290 [i915]
__engines_record_defaults+0xca/0x440 [i915]
intel_gt_init+0x275/0x430 [i915]
i915_gem_init+0x135/0x2c0 [i915]
i915_driver_probe+0x8d1/0xdc0 [i915]
v2: removed whole intel_gt_release_all
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8489
Fixes: bec68cc9ea42d8 ("drm/i915: Prepare for multiple GTs")
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>
---
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114-dont_clean_gt_on_error_path-v1-1-37f2fa827fd2@xxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 11 -----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 4 +---
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
index ed32bf5b15464e..ba1186fc524f84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
@@ -982,8 +982,6 @@ int intel_gt_probe_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
err:
i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to initialize %s! (%d)\n", gtdef->name, ret);
- intel_gt_release_all(i915);
-
return ret;
}
@@ -1002,15 +1000,6 @@ int intel_gt_tiles_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
return 0;
}
-void intel_gt_release_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
-{
- struct intel_gt *gt;
- unsigned int id;
-
- for_each_gt(gt, i915, id)
- i915->gt[id] = NULL;
-}
-
void intel_gt_info_print(const struct intel_gt_info *info,
struct drm_printer *p)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
index 01fd25b622d16c..2a1faf4039659c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ int i915_driver_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
ret = i915_driver_mmio_probe(i915);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out_tiles_cleanup;
+ goto out_runtime_pm_put;
ret = i915_driver_hw_probe(i915);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -836,8 +836,6 @@ int i915_driver_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
i915_ggtt_driver_late_release(i915);
out_cleanup_mmio:
i915_driver_mmio_release(i915);
-out_tiles_cleanup:
- intel_gt_release_all(i915);
out_runtime_pm_put:
enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&i915->runtime_pm);
i915_driver_late_release(i915);
---
base-commit: 1489bab52c281a869295414031a56506a375b036
change-id: 20231114-dont_clean_gt_on_error_path-91cd9c3caa0a
Looks okay.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Although on the overall driver init/exit in general again started
feeling a bit messy. Seems like it would need an overhaul every few
years to keep tidy and logical but meh.
Regards,
Tvrtko