On Tue, 2023-11-14 at 11:35 +0000, Manna, Animesh wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Coelho, Luciano <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 4:47 PM > > To: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] drm/i915/dsb: DSB code refactoring > > > > On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 08:55 +0530, Animesh Manna wrote: > > > Refactor DSB implementation to be compatible with Xe driver. > > > > > > v1: RFC version. > > > v2: Make intel_dsb structure opaque from external usage. [Jani] > > > v3: Rebased on latest. > > > v4: > > > - Add boundary check in dsb_buffer_memset(). [Luca] > > > - Use size_t instead of u32. [Luca] > > > v5: WARN_ON() added for out of boudary case with some optimization. > > [Luca] > > > > ...and what is different in v6? > > Rebased on latest and fix a rebase-miss which CI did not caught well. Before merging want the green signal from CI. Okay, it's good to mention that. Anyway, my r-b is still valid. ;) -- Cheers, Luca.
