On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:26:17PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I only wanted to do some small cleanups to vlv_find_best_dpll(), > but it seems I went slightly mad again. > > After realizing that I have to cook up quite a few more patches, > I decided to also split up the functional changes from my earlier > vlv_find_best_dpll() rewrite patch. And this series is the result. > > And the usual warning applies: Totally untested Can you pls also take a look at the DP regression due to Chon Lee's patches that Jesse reported when you go about testing this stuff? -Daniel > > Ville Syrjälä (14): > drm/i915: Eliminate one indent leel from vlv_find_best_dpll > drm/i915: Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() > drm/i915: Make vlv_find_best_dpll() ppm calculation safe > drm/i915: Don't underflow bestppm > drm/i915: Rewrite vlv_find_best_dpll() > drm/i915: De-magic the VLV p2 divider step size > drm/i915: Make sure we respect n.max on VLV > drm/i915: Clarify VLV PLL p1 limits > drm/i915: Allow p1 divider 2 on VLV > drm/i915: Respect p2 divider minimum limit on VLV > drm/i915: Remove the unused p and m limits for VLV > drm/i915: Remove unused dot_limit from VLV PLL limits > drm/i915: intel_limits_vlv_dac and intel_limits_vlv_hdmi are the same > drm/i915: Don't lie about findind suitable PLL settings on VLV > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
