A follow-up patch will add up all the overheads on a DP link, where it
makes more sense to specify each overhead factor in terms of the added
overhead amount vs. the reciprocal remainder (of usable BW remaining
after deducting the overhead). Prepare for that here, keeping the
existing behavior.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 2048649b420b2..0c0f026fb3161 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
#define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0 340000
#define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1 400000
-/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = 1/(0.972261) */
-#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 972261
+/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = 1/(0.972261) = 1.028530 ppm */
+#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 1028530
/* Compliance test status bits */
#define INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_SHIFT_MASK 0
@@ -680,8 +680,8 @@ int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
u32 intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(u32 mode_clock)
{
- return div_u64(mul_u32_u32(mode_clock, 1000000U),
- DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR);
+ return div_u64(mul_u32_u32(mode_clock, DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR),
+ 1000000U);
}
static int
--
2.39.2
