Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 13:21 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023, "Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 12:11 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023, Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > The uncore code may not always be available (e.g. when we build the
> > > > display code with Xe), so we can't always rely on having the uncore's
> > > > spinlock.
> > > > 
> > > > To handle this, split the spin_lock/unlock_irqsave/restore() into
> > > > spin_lock/unlock() followed by a call to local_irq_save/restore() and
> > > > create wrapper functions for locking and unlocking the uncore's
> > > > spinlock.  In these functions, we have a condition check and only
> > > > actually try to lock/unlock the spinlock when I915 is defined, and
> > > > thus uncore is available.
> > > > 
> > > > This keeps the ifdefs contained in these new functions and all such
> > > > logic inside the display code.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Note: this patch was accidentally sent only to intel-xe[1], but should
> > > > have been sent to intel-gfx.  Thus, this is v2.
> > > > 
> > > > In v2:
> > > > 
> > > >    * Renamed uncore_spin_*() to intel_spin_*()
> > > >    * Corrected the order: save, lock, unlock, restore
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/563288/
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c  | 19 ++++++++++-------
> > > >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > > index 0e5dffe8f018..099476906f4c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> > > >  
> > > >  #include "i915_reg_defs.h"
> > > >  #include "intel_display_limits.h"
> > > > +#include "i915_drv.h"
> > > 
> > > In general, please avoid including headers from headers. In particular,
> > > please don't include i915_drv.h from headers. The header
> > > interdependencies are pretty bad already, and we need to clean it up.
> > 
> > Right, I thought twice about this, but this seems far from clean, as
> > you say, so I thought it would be fine.
> 
> Adding that single include bumps the total recursive includes of this
> file from 2 to 97... i915_drv.h is pretty bad.

Argh.  I'm sending a v3 asap! :)

--
Luca.




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux