On Wed, 11 Oct 2023, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2023.10.04 15:54:11 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > gvt.h has no need to include i915_drv.h once the unused to_gvt() has
>> > been removed.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Zhenyu, Zhi, ping?
>>
>
> Sorry for late reply, as last week was full holiday here.
>
> Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I don't think I need to do extra pick and pull request for this or
> let me know if you has question.
Did you pick them up to gvt-next or shall I pick them up to
drm-intel-next?
If the former, I think I'd actually like a pull request, because
otherwise the trees will be out-of-sync for a long time.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Thanks!
>
>>
>>
>>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h | 7 +------
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
>> > index 53a0a42a50db..3a0624fe63bf 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
>> > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
>> >
>> > #include <asm/kvm_page_track.h>
>> >
>> > -#include "i915_drv.h"
>> > +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
>> > #include "intel_gvt.h"
>> >
>> > #include "debug.h"
>> > @@ -368,11 +368,6 @@ struct intel_gvt {
>> > struct dentry *debugfs_root;
>> > };
>> >
>> > -static inline struct intel_gvt *to_gvt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> > -{
>> > - return i915->gvt;
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > enum {
>> > /* Scheduling trigger by timer */
>> > INTEL_GVT_REQUEST_SCHED = 0,
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
