On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:04:43PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/9/21 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>: > > It only controls the setting of the vbt.edp_support variable, which in > > turn only controls one debug output plus can also force-disable the > > lvds output. > > > > Since the value only restricted this logic to mobile ilk there's the > > slight risk that this will break lvds on desktop ilk or on snb/ivb > > platforms. But with the vbt it's better when we know what's going on > > here, so let's rip it out and see what happens. > > I think this is a little bit too risky, but the patch does what it > says in the box and also mentions the risk... I was going to give a > Reviewed-by tag and leave the merge-or-not-merge question to the > maintainer, but I noticed the patch is already even merged (by > accident?). I was lazy and didn't create a seperate branch for it ;-) Can I still smash your r-b on top? > Are we aware of any real-world machines with eDP + LVDS? I haven't seen any of those. What has been observed in the wild is lvds + sdvo lvds, but I've never seen edp + some other panel anywhere ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
