On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The goal is to have this function ready for Xe to use > directly. So, let's use the available macro. Seesm wrong to use DISPLAY_INFO() as an lvalue, and I'm not sure why this wouldn't work as-is. But *shrug*. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> for merging to i915. (xe should come as a backport with cherry-pick -x.) BR, Jani > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c > index a6a18eae7ae8..ce55b968e658 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c > @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ void intel_display_device_probe(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > else > info = probe_display(i915); > > - i915->display.info.__device_info = info; > + DISPLAY_INFO(i915) = info; > > memcpy(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915), > &DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->__runtime_defaults, -- Jani Nikula, Intel
