Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/fbc: Split plane tiling checks per-platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:00:44AM +0000, Govindapillai, Vinod wrote:
> Hi Ville,
> 
> On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 14:38 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Carve up tiling_is_valid() into per-platform variants to
> > make it easier to see what limits are actually being imposed.
> > 
> > TODO: maybe go for vfuncs later
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > index 4c4626c84666..052f9d8b53d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > @@ -984,16 +984,21 @@ static bool intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(const struct
> > intel_plane_state *
> >         return effective_w <= max_w && effective_h <= max_h;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static bool tiling_is_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > +static bool i8xx_fbc_tiling_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > +{
> > +       const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> > +
> > +       return fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool skl_fbc_tiling_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> >  {
> > -       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(plane_state->uapi.plane->dev);
> >         const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> >  
> >         switch (fb->modifier) {
> >         case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
> >         case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED:
> >         case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED:
> > -               return DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9;
> >         case I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED:
> >         case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> >                 return true;
> > @@ -1002,6 +1007,16 @@ static bool tiling_is_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> >         }
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool tiling_is_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > +{
> > +       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(plane_state->uapi.plane->dev);
> > +
> > +       if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9)
> > +               return skl_fbc_tiling_valid(plane_state);
> > +       else
> > +               return i8xx_fbc_tiling_valid(plane_state);
> I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED is not checked for i8xx_fbc_tiling_valid() comparing to the original code.
> Is that intentional? 

Tile4 was introduced in dg2/mtl

> 
> With that checked,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void intel_fbc_update_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >                                    struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >                                    struct intel_plane *plane)
> 

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux