On 9/26/23 16:15, Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho wrote:
The functions drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and
fb_plane_{width,height} do exactly the same job of its
equivalents drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} from drm_fourcc.
The only reason to have these functions on drm_framebuffer
would be if they would added a abstraction layer to call it just
passing a drm_framebuffer pointer and the desired plane index,
which is not the case, where these functions actually implements
just part of it. In the actual implementation, every call to both
drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and fb_plane_{width,height} should
pass some drm_framebuffer attribute, which is the same as calling the
drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} functions.
The drm_format_info_pane_{width,height} functions are much more
consistent in both its implementation and its location on code. The
kind of calculation that they do is intrinsically derivated from the
drm_format_info struct and has not to do with drm_framebuffer, except
by the potential motivation described above, which is still not a good
justification to have drm_framebuffer functions to calculate it.
So, replace each drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and
fb_plane_{width,height} call to drm_format_info_plane_{width,height}
and remove them.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho <gcarlos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@xxxxxxxxxx>
