On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 02:14:39PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:07:30AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx> In Lunar Lake we now separate MDCLK from CDLCK, which used to be before always 2 times CDCLK. Now we might afford lower CDCLK, while having higher memory clock, so improving bandwidth and power consumption at the same time. This is prep work required to enable that. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c index fdd8d04fe12c..3e566f45996d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c @@ -1223,6 +1223,7 @@ static void skl_cdclk_uninit_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) struct intel_cdclk_vals { u32 cdclk; + u32 mdclk; u16 refclk; u16 waveform; u8 divider; /* CD2X divider * 2 */ @@ -1524,6 +1525,8 @@ static void bxt_de_pll_readout(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, static void bxt_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config) { + const struct intel_cdclk_vals *table = dev_priv->display.cdclk.table; + int i, ratio, tbl_waveform = 0; u32 squash_ctl = 0; u32 divider; int div; @@ -1574,10 +1577,36 @@ static void bxt_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, cdclk_config->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(hweight16(waveform) * cdclk_config->vco, size * div); + tbl_waveform = squash_ctl & CDCLK_SQUASH_WAVEFORM_MASK; } else { cdclk_config->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_config->vco, div); } + ratio = cdclk_config->vco / cdclk_config->ref; + + for (i = 0; table[i].refclk; i++) { + if (table[i].refclk != cdclk_config->ref) + continue; + + if (table[i].divider != div) + continue; + + if (table[i].waveform != tbl_waveform) + continue; + + if (table[i].ratio != ratio) + continue; + + /* + * Supported from LunarLake HW onwards, however considering that + * besides this the whole procedure is the same, we keep this + * for all the platforms. + */ + cdclk_config->mdclk = table[i].mdclk; + + break; + }I might be misunderstanding something, but from bspec 68861, is looks like the mdclk frequency is always just "ratio * refclk." Which is the value we already have stored in cdclk_config->vco. Do we need to do this extra lookup or track this value separately?
It seems it could be different based on the source of the clock. CDCLK_CTL has the config and could select the clock to be configured either from CDCLK or CD2XCLK. However the LNL table has all the entries with CDCLK as the source, so indeed it seems redundant. And even if we had a cd2xclk source, it seems a waste of space to add this field to the table that could easily be computed. I will drop this patch in v2. thanks Lucas De Marchi
Matt+ out: /* * Can't read this out :( Let's assume it's @@ -2191,6 +2220,7 @@ bool intel_cdclk_needs_modeset(const struct intel_cdclk_config *a, const struct intel_cdclk_config *b) { return a->cdclk != b->cdclk || + a->mdclk != b->mdclk || a->vco != b->vco || a->ref != b->ref; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h index 48fd7d39e0cd..3e7eabd4d7b6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct intel_atomic_state; struct intel_crtc_state; struct intel_cdclk_config { - unsigned int cdclk, vco, ref, bypass; + unsigned int cdclk, mdclk, vco, ref, bypass; u8 voltage_level; }; -- 2.40.1-- Matt Roper Graphics Software Engineer Linux GPU Platform Enablement Intel Corporation
