Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 31/42] drm/i915/lnl: Add gmbus/ddc support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 02:55:33PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 09:25:54PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 01:49:21PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:07:29AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > LNL's south display uses the same table as MTP. Check for LNL's fake PCH
> > to make it consistent with the other checks.
> >
> > The VBT table doesn't contain the VBT -> spec mapping for LNL. Like in
> > other cases, uses the same as the previous platform.
> >
> > Bspec: 68971, 20124
> > Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c  | 2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 5 ++++-
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > index 097c1f23d3ae..3772b91e155c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ static u8 map_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 vbt_pin)
> >  	const u8 *ddc_pin_map;
> >  	int i, n_entries;
> >
> > -	if (HAS_PCH_MTP(i915) || IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915)) {
> > +	if (HAS_PCH_MTP(i915) || IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915) || IS_LUNARLAKE(i915)) {
>
> The LUNARLAKE here vs PCH_LNL below seems inconsistent.  Either way, we
> should probably put the newer platform first in the condition.
>
> Aside from those

If we drop IS_LUNARLAKE, then we need to check for something else here.
What about doing this?


	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) >= PCH_LNL || HAS_PCH_MTP(i915) || IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915)) {

?

Yeah, that's fine in the short term.  Although I wonder if moving
PCH_LNL before the discrete GPUs might simplify the various conditions
that need to match on SDE behavior since it's probably closer to the MTL
SDE than to the discrete SDEs?  I haven't looked through all the
conditions to see which order is simplest overall.

Longer term I think we need to replace the whole intel_pch enum with an
intel_sde enum or something since this stuff generally isn't related to
PCH anymore, and we should be looking at different things to determine
the exact version of the SDE logic.

- For MTL, both NDE and SDE live on the same die (SOC); PCH isn't
  involved.
- For LNL, NDE lives on the compute die and SDE lives on the SOC die
  (as does the PICA, so the PICA ID can be used to fingerprint a
  specific version).

Yeah, agreed.

Lucas De Marchi



Matt


>
>        Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> >  		ddc_pin_map = adlp_ddc_pin_map;
> >  		n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(adlp_ddc_pin_map);
> >  	} else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(i915)) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> > index e95ddb580ef6..801fabbccf7e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> > @@ -155,7 +155,10 @@ static const struct gmbus_pin *get_gmbus_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> >  	const struct gmbus_pin *pins;
> >  	size_t size;
> >
> > -	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) >= PCH_DG2) {
> > +	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) >= PCH_LNL) {
> > +		pins = gmbus_pins_mtp;
> > +		size = ARRAY_SIZE(gmbus_pins_mtp);
> > +	} else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) >= PCH_DG2) {
> >  		pins = gmbus_pins_dg2;
> >  		size = ARRAY_SIZE(gmbus_pins_dg2);
> >  	} else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) >= PCH_DG1) {
> > --
> > 2.40.1
> >
>
> --
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> Linux GPU Platform Enablement
> Intel Corporation

--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux