Re: [PATCH i-g-t] i915_pm_freq_api: Add some debug to tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/8/2023 12:36 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jul 2023 16:23:59 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
Some subtests seem to be failing in CI, use igt_assert_(lt/eq) which
print the values being compared and some additional debug as well.

Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 18 ++++++++----------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
index 522abee35..cdb2e70ca 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt)
	rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
	rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ);
	rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ);
+	igt_debug("RPn: %d, RPe: %d, RP0: %d", rpn, rpe, rp0);
Print gt here too.
ok.

	/*
	 * Negative bound tests
@@ -90,21 +91,18 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt, int count)
	int fd;

	for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-		igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0,
-			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
-		igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0,
-			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
+		igt_debug("Running cycle: %d", i);
+		igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
+		igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
		usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
-		igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn,
-			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
+		igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn);

		/* Manually trigger a GT reset */
		fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY);
		igt_require(fd >= 0);
		igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2));

-		igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn,
-			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
+		igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn);
Probably ok but why the changes in this loop?

There are a couple of bugs that are failing around this area.

Thanks,

Vinay.


	}
	close(fd);
  }
@@ -116,13 +114,13 @@ static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
	usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
-	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+	igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn);

	/* Manually trigger a suspend */
	igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
				      SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);

-	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+	igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn);
  }

  int i915 = -1;
--
2.38.1




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux