> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 7:23 PM
> To: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-
> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/hdcp: Add a debug statement at hdcp2
> capability check
>
> Hello Suraj,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 2:25 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
> > <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>; Kandpal, Suraj
> > <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/hdcp: Add a debug statement at hdcp2
> > capability check
> >
> > Add a debug statement at hdcp2 capability check which indicates if GSC
> > CS is causing hdcp2 incapability
> >
> > --v2
> > -correcttypo in commit header
> >
> > --v3
> > -correct the other typo in commit header [Jani]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > index 5ed450111f77..73fe84fc9bf5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > @@ -177,8 +177,11 @@ bool intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector
> > *connector)
> > struct intel_gt *gt = i915->media_gt;
> > struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc = gt ? >->uc.gsc : NULL;
> >
> > - if (!gsc || !intel_uc_fw_is_running(&gsc->fw))
> > + if (!gsc || !intel_uc_fw_is_running(&gsc->fw)) {
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> > + "GSC components required for HDCP2.2
> are
> > not ready\n");
>
> The change looks good to me. Only a small query, Is it important to know at
> this point, for which condition out of the two, we actually fail?
>
Normally we had a clear indication what caused hdcp2.2 incapability but with addition
of gsc we needed a debug statement for this and both the above condition if failed point towards
gsc being an issue which make me reason that we wouldn't need to differentiate which of the two
conditions failed.
Regards,
Suraj Kandpal
> Regards
>
> Chaitanya
>
> > return false;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* MEI/GSC interface is solid depending on which is used */
> > --
> > 2.25.1
