On Wed, 31 May 2023 16:56:33 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote: > > ggtt offset for hw_tail is not required for the calculations, so drop > it. > > Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > index 29124dcba8e2..beb1269422ca 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static bool oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream) > partial_report_size %= report_size; > > /* Subtract partial amount off the tail */ > - hw_tail = gtt_offset + OA_TAKEN(hw_tail, partial_report_size); > + hw_tail = OA_TAKEN(hw_tail, partial_report_size); > > > /* NB: The head we observe here might effectively be a little > @@ -575,7 +575,6 @@ static bool oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream) > head = stream->oa_buffer.head - gtt_offset; > aged_tail = stream->oa_buffer.tail - gtt_offset; > > - hw_tail -= gtt_offset; Yes gtt_offset addition/subtraction is now redundant after we drop the if-else. Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@xxxxxxxxx> > tail = hw_tail; > > /* Walk the stream backward until we find a report with report > -- > 2.36.1 >
