On 5/27/2023 12:38 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
Prepare for re-enabling -Wunused-but-set-variable.
Lacking a better idea, annotate the gma_bottom variables with
__maybe_unused.
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Frankly I'm not sure what to do with these. Maybe the variables should
be dropped altogether?
I sent an patch to fix the warnings. You can include that one in the
series. Zhenyu, can you give an rb?
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
index 3c4ae1da0d41..2801e17e5522 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
@@ -2833,7 +2833,7 @@ static int command_scan(struct parser_exec_state *s,
static int scan_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
{
- unsigned long gma_head, gma_tail, gma_bottom;
+ unsigned long gma_head, gma_tail, __maybe_unused gma_bottom;
struct parser_exec_state s;
int ret = 0;
@@ -2874,7 +2874,7 @@ static int scan_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
static int scan_wa_ctx(struct intel_shadow_wa_ctx *wa_ctx)
{
- unsigned long gma_head, gma_tail, gma_bottom, ring_size, ring_tail;
+ unsigned long gma_head, gma_tail, __maybe_unused gma_bottom, ring_size, ring_tail;
struct parser_exec_state s;
int ret = 0;
struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload = container_of(wa_ctx,
