Mark, On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 5:59 AM Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 02:07:51AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On 20/05/2023 00:16, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 07:55:47PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > > On 19/04/2023 18:43, Mark Yacoub wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > This is v10 of the HDCP patches. The patches are authored by Sean Paul. > > > > > I rebased and addressed the review comments in v6-v10. > > > > > > > > > > Main change in v10 is handling the kernel test bot warnings. > > > > > > > > > > Patches 1-4 focus on moving the common HDCP helpers to common DRM. > > > > > This introduces a slight change in the original intel flow > > > > > as it splits the unique driver protocol from the generic implementation. > > > > > > > > > > Patches 5-7 split the HDCP flow on the i915 driver to make use of the common DRM helpers. > > > > > > > > > > Patches 8-10 implement HDCP on MSM driver. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > -Mark Yacoub > > > > > > > > > > Sean Paul (10): > > > > > drm/hdcp: Add drm_hdcp_atomic_check() > > > > > drm/hdcp: Avoid changing crtc state in hdcp atomic check > > > > > drm/hdcp: Update property value on content type and user changes > > > > > drm/hdcp: Expand HDCP helper library for enable/disable/check > > > > > drm/i915/hdcp: Consolidate HDCP setup/state cache > > > > > drm/i915/hdcp: Retain hdcp_capable return codes > > > > > drm/i915/hdcp: Use HDCP helpers for i915 > > > > > dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add bindings for HDCP registers > > > > > arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add support for HDCP in dp-controller > > > > > > > > Dear i915 maintainers, > > > > > > > > I wanted to ping you regarding this patch series. If there are no comments > > > > for the series from you side, would it be possible to land Intel-specific > > > > and generic patches into drm-intel tree? We will continue working on the msm > > > > specific parts and merge them through the msm tree. > > > > > > pushed to drm-intel-next. > > > > > > should be propagated in a few weeks to drm-next on our next pull request. > > > > Probably there is some kind of confusion here. You've pushed the DSC > > patches, while the response was sent to the HDCP series. > > I'm sorry, my confusion for replying to the wrong thread. > > So, on this one here I believe it would be helpful if there's a split > in the series with the already reviewed ones related to i915 are resent > separated from the rest, send with --subject-prefix="CI" so when that > pass CI we just merge it through drm-intel-next It sounds like this is waiting on you to post just the first 7 patches with the proper subject prefix so they can land through the Intel tree. -Doug