On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 01:59:12PM +0100, broonie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 23baf831a32c0 ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely")
>
> from the mm-stable tree and commit:
>
> 56e51681246e5 ("drm/ttm: revert "Reduce the number of used allocation orders for TTM pages"")
>
> from the drm-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> index 4db3982057be8,dfce896c4baeb..0000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
>
> [Just the version in mm]
Note there was a ppc compile fail, which is why we pushed the ttm revert.
That /should/ be fixed now, but would be good if you can confirm?
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
