On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:32:15AM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> This spin lock will not be used in older display versions, so no need
> to initialize it.
>
> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> index 5bce7b5b27bc7..1c5d410b74e5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> @@ -108,5 +108,6 @@ intel_dkl_phy_posting_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_dkl_phy_r
> void
> intel_dkl_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - spin_lock_init(&i915->display.dkl.phy_lock);
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
Looks like a pointless check to me. This is so cheap it doesn't
matter, and less LOC is better.
> + spin_lock_init(&i915->display.dkl.phy_lock);
> }
> --
> 2.40.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
