>
alan:snip
> > @@ -140,10 +141,15 @@ static void pxp_init_full(struct intel_pxp *pxp)
> > if (ret)
> > return;
> >
> > - if (HAS_ENGINE(pxp->ctrl_gt, GSC0))
> > + if (HAS_ENGINE(pxp->ctrl_gt, GSC0)) {
> > ret = intel_pxp_gsccs_init(pxp);
> > - else
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + with_intel_runtime_pm(&pxp->ctrl_gt->i915->runtime_pm, wakeref)
> > + intel_pxp_init_hw(pxp);
>
> personal preference: I'd move this (and the matching call in fini)
> inside intel_pxp_gsccs_init/fini. That way we can see this as more
> back-end specific: the gsccs initialize everything immediately, while
> the tee back-end follows a 2-step approach with the component.
> Not a blocker since it is a personal preference, so with or without the
> change:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Daniele
alan: will make that change too - thanks for the R-b.
alan:snip
