There's not much point in a static work function having a kernel-doc comment. Just clean it up and make it a regular comment. This fixes the kernel-doc warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c:1370: warning: Function parameter or member 'work' not described in 'intel_tc_port_disconnect_phy_work' drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c:1370: warning: Excess function parameter 'dig_port' description in 'intel_tc_port_disconnect_phy_work' Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c index 2bb02d4e6859..3b60995e9dfb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c @@ -1358,10 +1358,7 @@ void intel_tc_port_lock(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port) __intel_tc_port_lock(to_tc_port(dig_port), 1); } -/** - * intel_tc_port_disconnect_phy_work: disconnect TypeC PHY from display port - * @dig_port: digital port - * +/* * Disconnect the given digital port from its TypeC PHY (handing back the * control of the PHY to the TypeC subsystem). This will happen in a delayed * manner after each aux transactions and modeset disables. -- 2.39.2
