Hi, On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 08:21:17PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > From: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@xxxxxxxxx> > > The gt_tlb live selftest has the same code coverage as the > igt_cs_tlb subtest of gtt, except it is better at detecting > TLB bugs. Furthermore, while igt_cs_tlb is hitting some > unforeseen issues, these issues are either false positives > due to the test being poorly formatted, or are true > positives that can be more easily diagnosed with smaller > tests. As such, igt_cs_tlb is superceded by and obsoleted > by gt_tlb, meaning it can be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This patch, anyway needs some follow up for adding the range TLB invalidation part. Andi
