On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> The pipe may differ from crtc index if pipes are fused off. For testing
> purposes, IGT needs to know the pipe.
>
> There's already a I915_GET_PIPE_FROM_CRTC_ID IOCTL for this. However,
> the upcoming Xe driver won't have that IOCTL, and going forward, we'll
> want a unified interface for testing i915 and Xe, as they share the
> display code. Thus add the debugfs for i915 display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index faa44fb80aac..e85270adca95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -1657,6 +1657,17 @@ static int i915_current_bpc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> }
> DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_current_bpc);
>
> +/* Pipe may differ from crtc index if pipes are fused off */
> +static int intel_crtc_pipe_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = m->private;
> +
> + seq_printf(m, "%d\n", crtc->pipe);
Are we happy with an integer or should we use the actual alphabetic
name here?
Either way, the series is:
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(intel_crtc_pipe);
> +
> /**
> * intel_connector_debugfs_add - add i915 specific connector debugfs files
> * @connector: pointer to a registered drm_connector
> @@ -1735,4 +1746,6 @@ void intel_crtc_debugfs_add(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>
> debugfs_create_file("i915_current_bpc", 0444, root, crtc,
> &i915_current_bpc_fops);
> + debugfs_create_file("i915_pipe", 0444, root, crtc,
> + &intel_crtc_pipe_fops);
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
