On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:02:17AM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Fix build with WERROR=y > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/115046/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > Error: make failed > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh > DESCEND objtool > INSTALL libsubcmd_headers > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.o > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c:6: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c: In function ‘dg1_gt_workarounds_init’: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c:1482:13: error: ‘i915’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘to_i915’? Huh. I guess CI keeps on trying to build against the last succesfully built drm-tip tag? But there is no hint here about that... Ewelina, this seems to be another place where CI needs improvements: - report the baseline against which the patch was applied - report drm-tip build failures > 1482 | if (IS_DG1(i915)) > | ^~~~ > ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:559:45: note: in definition of macro ‘IS_DG1’ > 559 | #define IS_DG1(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG1) > | ^~~~~~~~ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c:1482:13: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > 1482 | if (IS_DG1(i915)) > | ^~~~ > ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:559:45: note: in definition of macro ‘IS_DG1’ > 559 | #define IS_DG1(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG1) > | ^~~~~~~~ > make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:252: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.o] Error 1 > make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: drivers/gpu/drm/i915] Error 2 > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: drivers/gpu/drm] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: drivers/gpu] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: drivers] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:2028: .] Error 2 > -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
