Re: [PATCH v2 07/18] drm/i915: Sanitize child devices later

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:40:35AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index f35ef3675d39..19be8862261b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -2221,33 +2221,33 @@ static u8 map_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 vbt_pin)
>  		    vbt_pin);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static enum port get_port_by_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 ddc_pin)
> +static struct intel_encoder *
> +get_encoder_by_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 ddc_pin)
>  {
> -	enum port port;
> +	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
>  
>  	if (!ddc_pin)
> -		return PORT_NONE;
> +		return NULL;
>  
> -	for_each_port(port) {
> -		const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata =
> -			i915->display.vbt.ports[port];
> +	for_each_intel_encoder(&i915->drm, encoder) {
> +		const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata = encoder->devdata;
>  
>  		if (devdata && ddc_pin == devdata->child.ddc_pin)
> -			return port;
> +			return encoder;

This still screws up bat-jsl-3 where DDI A and DDI C both claim to use
the same ddc_pin. But DDI A is declared as eDP, so won't even use DDC.
Se we should just ignore it here. 

I suppose to correct fix would to look at the actually selected
ddc_pin/aux_ch here, rather than what the VBT declared.

>  	}
>  
> -	return PORT_NONE;
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux