Re: [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: add dev_priv->pm_irq_mask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:57:15PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Just like irq_mask and gt_irq_mask, use it to track the status of
> GEN6_PMIMR so we don't need to read it again every time we call
> snb_update_pm_irq.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 9ff09a2..b621f5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
>  	/** Cached value of IMR to avoid reads in updating the bitfield */
>  	u32 irq_mask;
>  	u32 gt_irq_mask;
> +	u32 pm_irq_mask;
>  
>  	struct work_struct hotplug_work;
>  	bool enable_hotplug_processing;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index a1255da..d96bd1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -142,16 +142,17 @@ static void snb_update_pm_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			      uint32_t interrupt_mask,
>  			      uint32_t enabled_irq_mask)
>  {
> -	uint32_t pmimr, new_val;
> +	uint32_t new_val;
>  
>  	assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>  
> -	pmimr = new_val = I915_READ(GEN6_PMIMR);
> +	new_val = dev_priv->pm_irq_mask;
>  	new_val &= ~interrupt_mask;
>  	new_val |= (~enabled_irq_mask & interrupt_mask);
>  
> -	if (new_val != pmimr) {
> -		I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, new_val);
> +	if (new_val != dev_priv->pm_irq_mask) {
> +		dev_priv->pm_irq_mask = new_val;
> +		I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, dev_priv->pm_irq_mask);
>  		POSTING_READ(GEN6_PMIMR);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -2221,8 +2222,9 @@ static void gen5_gt_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		if (HAS_VEBOX(dev))
>  			pm_irqs |= PM_VEBOX_USER_INTERRUPT;
>  
> +		dev_priv->pm_irq_mask = 0xffffffff;
>  		I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIIR, I915_READ(GEN6_PMIIR));
> -		I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, 0xffffffff);

Same write happening at gen5_gt_irq_preinstall...
it is already strange a gen5_ func using a GEN6 reg, but maybe we have to use this same pm_irq_mask there also...


> +		I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, dev_priv->pm_irq_mask);
>  		I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIER, pm_irqs);
>  		POSTING_READ(GEN6_PMIER);
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2

Anyways, feel free to use:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux