> From: Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 10:05 AM
>
> > From: Zhao, Yan Y <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 7:39 AM
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 07:13:47AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> > ...
> > > +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > + unsigned long arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > + struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind;
> > > + struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = NULL;
> > > + struct fd f;
> > > + unsigned long minsz;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd, out_devid);
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_from_user(&bind, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + if (bind.argsz < minsz || bind.flags)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (!device->ops->bind_iommufd)
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + ret = vfio_device_claim_group(device);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > + /*
> > > + * If already been bound to an iommufd, or already set noiommu
> > > + * then fail it.
> > > + */
> > > + if (df->iommufd || df->noiommu) {
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* iommufd < 0 means noiommu mode */
> > > + if (bind.iommufd < 0) {
> > > + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
> > > + ret = -EPERM;
> > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > + }
> > > + df->noiommu = true;
> > > + } else {
> > > + f = fdget(bind.iommufd);
> > > + if (!f.file) {
> > > + ret = -EBADF;
> > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > + }
> > > + iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(iommufd)) {
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(iommufd);
> > > + goto out_put_file;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
> > > + * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain a
> > > + * reference. This reference is held until device closed. Save
> > > + * the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
> > > + */
> > > + vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df);
> > > +
> > > + df->iommufd = iommufd;
> > > + ret = vfio_device_open(df, &bind.out_devid, NULL);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto out_put_kvm;
> > > +
> > > + ret = copy_to_user((void __user *)arg +
> > > + offsetofend(struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd,
> > iommufd),
> > > + &bind.out_devid,
> > > + sizeof(bind.out_devid)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto out_close_device;
> > > +
> > > + if (iommufd)
> > > + fdput(f);
> > > + else if (df->noiommu)
> > > + dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device used by user
> "
> > > + "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm,
> task_pid_nr(current));
> >
> > IMHO, the "smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);" in patch 7
> > should be moved to here when bind is indeed successful.
> >
>
> yes. in that case patch7 should put release in vfio_device_group_open()
> and then add a new release here.
Right. This needs to be set in the caller instead of the vfio_device_open().
Done in the latest branch on github.
Regards,
Yi Liu
