On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:49:04PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:59:09AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > In the execbuf code we don't clean up any vmas which ended up not > > getting bound for code simplicity. To make sure that we don't end up > > creating multiple vma for the same vm kill the somewhat dangerous > > vma_create function and inline it into lookup_or_create. > > Just make it static. It's a nice little standalone function that helps > the reader. I'm afraid that someone will use it eventually. I'll smash a __ prefix onto it to make it clear that people better don't touch it. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
